Effect of Lymphocyte Phenotypic Alterations on the Humoral Response to Vaccination Against SARS-COV-2 in Dialysis Patients.

Background: The response to vaccination against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) varies depending on comorbidities. This study evaluated the clinical and immunological factors affecting the humoral response of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) to the BNT162b2 vaccine. Methods: Humoral immunity was evaluated in 54 ESRD patients using serum levels of anti-receptor-binding domain (RBD) and neutralizing antibodies (NAbs), measured by a chemiluminescent immunoassay 30 (T1), 60 (T2), and 120 (T3) days after the second vaccine dose. The results were correlated to baseline patient T- and B-lymphocyte subpopulations determined by flow cytometry. Results: The proportion of seroconverted patients based on the NAb titer decreased from 83.3% at T1 to 53.7% at T3. Age was negatively correlated to the NAb titer at T1 and T2. Patients receiving hemodiafiltration had higher NAb titers at T3. Diabetes was associated with a lower response rate at T3. Univariate analysis revealed a positive correlation between the naïve CD4 T-lymphocyte population and RBD titer at T1 and the NAb titer at T3, with no association observed with naïve CD8 T lymphocytes. NAb titers at T3 were significantly correlated with late-differentiated CD4 T lymphocytes and terminally differentiated effector memory cells re-expressing CD45RA (TEMRA) CD8 T lymphocytes. RBD levels were positively correlated with naïve and memory B-lymphocyte counts at T3. Conclusions: Age, diabetes, and hemodialysis prescription had significant impacts on the response to vaccination. T- and B-lymphocyte phenotypes are major determinants of the humoral response potency to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination with BNT162b2 in patients with ESRD.

Prospective Analysis of B Lymphocyte Subtypes, before and after Initiation of Dialysis, in Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease.

End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is followed by alterations in adaptive immunity. The aim of this study was to evaluate B lymphocyte subtypes in ESRD patients before and after hemodialysis (HD) or continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). PATIENTS AND METHODS: CD5, CD27, BAFF, IgM and annexin were evaluated by flow cytometry on CD19+ cells in ESRD patients (n = 40), at time of initiating HD or CAPD (T0) and 6 months later (T6). RESULTS: A significant reduction in ESRD-T0 compared to controls was noticed for CD19+, 70.8 (46.5) vs. 171 (249), p < 0.0001, CD19+CD5-, 68.6 (43) vs. 168.9 (106), p < 0.0001, CD19+CD27-, 31.2 (22.1) vs. 59.7 (88.4), p < 0.0001, CD19+CD27+, 42.1 (63.6) vs. 84.3 (78.1), p = 0.002, CD19+BAFF+, 59.7 (37.8) vs. 127.9 (123.7), p < 0.0001 and CD19+IgM+ cells, 48.9 (42.8) vs. 112.5 (81.7) (K/µL), p < 0.0001. The ratio of early/late apoptotic B lymphocytes was reduced (16.8 (10.9) vs. 110 (25.4), p = 0.03). CD19+CD5+ cells were the only cell type with an increased proportion in ESRD-T0 patients (2.7 (3.7) vs. 0.6 (1.1), p < 0.0001). After 6 months on CAPD or HD, CD19+CD27-(%) and early apoptotic lymphocytes were reduced further. The HD patients also showed a significant increase in late apoptotic lymphocytes, from 1.2 (5.7) to 4.2 (7.2) K/mL, p = 0.02. CONCLUSIONS: B cells and most of their subtypes were significantly reduced in ESRD-T0 patients compared to controls, the only exception being CD19+CD5+ cells. Apoptotic changes were prominent in ESRD-T0 patients and were exacerbated by HD.

Relapse of Monoclonal Gammopathy of Renal Significance after mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination: A Case Report.

This case report represents the first suspected case of light chain deposition disease relapse associated with mRNA COVID-19 vaccination. The 75-year-old female patient of Greek ethnicity was admitted to the clinic for the investigation of worsening renal function detected on routine lab examinations, two weeks after she received the second dose of the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine (mRNA-1273). Rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis and anemia were the most notable findings. She had a history of LCDD, which had remained stable for four years. Serum protein immunofixation showed monoclonal kappa zones, and a bone marrow biopsy revealed 5% plasma cell infiltration. These, along with other investigations, established the diagnosis of LCDD recurrence. The patient was started on chemotherapy, which improved her immunological profile, but not her renal function. The patient has remained on hemodialysis since. The association between mRNA vaccinations and LCDD relapse may be grounds for investigations into the pathophysiology of MGRS, given the patient's previous long-term remission. This case report is not intended to directly inform changes in clinical practice. We must stress the importance of following all standardized vaccination protocols, especially in immunocompromised patients.

Cellular and Humoral Responses in Dialysis Patients after Vaccination with the BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 Vaccines.

The outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 has raised considerable concern about the detrimental effects it can induce in public health, with the interest of the scientific community being focused on the development of preventive and therapeutic approaches. Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are amongst vulnerable populations for critical illness owing to the presence of other comorbidities, their defective immune system, and their inability of self-isolation. To date, vaccination constitutes the most promising method to manage viral dispersion. Therefore, it is particularly important to investigate the effectiveness of available vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 in this risk group. Here, we summarize initial experience regarding the humoral and cellular immune responses elicited in dialysis patients after completion of the recommended vaccination regimen, as well as after booster dose administration, with one of the two mRNA vaccines, namely, BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273. In conclusion, a significantly diminished and delayed immune pattern was observed in ESRD patients compared to healthy population, with a peak in antibody titers occurring 3-5 weeks after the second dose. A booster dose significantly augmented the immune response in dialysis patients with either mRNA-based vaccine. Variables adversely correlating with the weak immunogenicity observed in dialysis patients include immunosuppressive therapy, older age, comorbidities, longer time in hemodialysis treatment, and higher body mass index. On the contrary, previous COVID-19 infection and administration of the mRNA-1273 vaccine are deemed to induce a more favorable immune response. Further investigation is needed to thoroughly understand the efficacy of mRNA-based vaccines in hemodialysis patients and define predictive factors that can influence it.

COVID-19 Infection and Response to Vaccination in Chronic Kidney Disease and Renal Transplantation: A Brief Presentation.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with phenotypic and functional changes in the immune system, followed by detrimental clinical consequences, such as severe infections and defective response to vaccination. Two years of the pandemic, due to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), have undoubtedly changed the world; however, all efforts to confront infection and provide new generation vaccines tremendously improved our understanding of the mechanisms of the immune response against infections and after vaccination. Humoral and cellular responses to vaccines, including mRNA vaccines, are apparently affected in CKD patients, as elimination of recent thymic emigrant and naïve lymphocytes and regulatory T-cells, together with contraction of T-cell repertoire and homeostatic proliferation rate, which characterized CKD patients are responsible for impaired immune activation. Successful renal transplantation will restore some of these changes, although several epigenetic changes are irreversible and even accelerated by the induction of immunosuppression. Response to vaccination is definitely impaired among both CKD and RT patients. In the present review, we analyzed the differences in immune response after vaccination between these patients and healthy individuals and depicted specific parameters, such as alterations in the immune system, predisposing to this deficient response.

ANCA-Associated Vasculitis May Result as a Complication to Both SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Vaccination.

In the last two years, our world experienced one of the most devastating and fast-exploding pandemic, due to the wide spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The scientific community managed to develop effective vaccines, the main weapons to shield the immune system and protect people. Nevertheless, both SARS-CoV-2 infection and the vaccination against it have been associated with the stimulation of inflammatory cells such as T and B lymphocytes that results in a cytokine storm, endothelial inflammation and vascular injury, which can lead to different types of vasculitis. We present the first case of de novo MPO-ANCA-associated vasculitis, which developed shortly after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, adequately responded to treatment, and subsequently relapsed after COVID-19 infection. With this case, we indicate an etiological connection between viral infection and disease development, as well as the possibility of a common immune mechanism between SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination, that can stimulate vascular events and lead to vasculitis. There have been several case reports of de novo vasculitis, affecting large, medium, or small vessels, following either infection or vaccination against COVID-19, during the pandemic outbreak. We summarize previous reports and also analyze proposed pathogenic mechanisms between SARS-CoV-2 and vasculitis.

Vaccinated and Convalescent Donor-Derived Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2-Specific T Cells as Adoptive Immunotherapy for High-Risk Coronavirus Disease 2019 Patients.

BACKGROUND: The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic poses an urgent need for the development of effective therapies for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS: We first tested SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cell (CοV-2-ST) immunity and expansion in unexposed donors, COVID-19-infected individuals (convalescent), asymptomatic polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-positive subjects, vaccinated individuals, non-intensive care unit (ICU) hospitalized patients, and ICU patients who either recovered and were discharged (ICU recovered) or had a prolonged stay and/or died (ICU critical). CoV-2-STs were generated from all types of donors and underwent phenotypic and functional assessment. RESULTS: We demonstrate causal relationship between the expansion of endogenous CoV-2-STs and the disease outcome; insufficient expansion of circulating CoV-2-STs identified hospitalized patients at high risk for an adverse outcome. CoV-2-STs with a similarly functional and non-alloreactive, albeit highly cytotoxic, profile against SARS-CoV-2 could be expanded from both convalescent and vaccinated donors generating clinical-scale, SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cell products with functional activity against both the unmutated virus and its B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 variants. In contrast, critical COVID-19 patient-originating CoV-2-STs failed to expand, recapitulating the in vivo failure of CoV-2-specific T-cell immunity to control the infection. CoV-2-STs generated from asymptomatic PCR-positive individuals presented only weak responses, whereas their counterparts originating from exposed to other seasonal coronaviruses subjects failed to kill the virus, thus disempowering the hypothesis of protective cross-immunity. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, we provide evidence on risk stratification of hospitalized COVID-19 patients and the feasibility of generating powerful CoV-2-ST products from both convalescent and vaccinated donors as an "off-the shelf" T-cell immunotherapy for high-risk patients.